Legal Opinion
Draper v. Healey
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 5, 2015No. Civil Action No. 14-12471-NMGPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action challenging the enforceability of 940 C.M.R. § 16.05(3) (“the regulation”), a state regulation promulgated by defendant Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (“the AG”) that requires load indicators or magazine disconnects on handguns sold by handgun dealers.1
There are three categories of plaintiffs: 1) individuals: Robert Draper, Ariel Weisberg, Donna Major, Eric Notkin, Robert Boudrie and Brent Carlton (collectively “consumer plaintiffs”), 2) business entities: Concord Armory, LLC and Precision Point…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ivan Pena v. Stephen LindleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Worma v. HealeyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018