Legal Opinion

United States v. Lawrence

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 14, 1921No. 2100PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 44126. --

1Opinion of the CourtMartiN, Judge

This appeal presents a question as to the proper classification for duty of certain newsprint paper imported from Canada.

Under the special revenue act of September 8, 1916 (T. D. 36667), paragraphs 322 and 567 of the tariff act of 1913 were amended so as to read in part as follows:

322. Printing paper (other than paper commercially known as handmade or machine handmade paper, japan paper, and imitation japan paper by whatever name known), unsized, sized, or glued, suitable for the printing of books and newspapers, but not for covers or bindings, not specially provided for in this section,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Saxonville Mills v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. United States v. Bennett & LoewenthalCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Kimball v. the CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Ullman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  5. Ballard v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1857

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Zenith Radio Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. Gertzen v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Ciba Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. American Pillowcase & Lace Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API