Legal Opinion

Rich v. Narofsky

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 17, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

624 A.2d 937 (1993)

Ruth A. (Narofsky) RICH

v.

Randell L. NAROFSKY.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Submitted on Briefs March 16, 1993.

Decided May 17, 1993.

Peter K. Mason, Searsport, for plaintiff.

Arthur J. Keenan, Packard & Keenan, Newport, for defendant.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD, COLLINS, RUDMAN and DANA, JJ.

DANA, Justice.

Defendant Randell Narofsky appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Waldo County, MacInnes, A.R.J.) affirming an amended divorce judgment entered in the District Court (Belfast, Staples, J.). Because the District Court abused its…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Hebert v. HebertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. Rich v. NarofskySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  5. Moore v. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API