Newport v. Chandler
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtKnox, J.
The primary question presented by this appeal is whether under the circumstances disclosed by the record a warranty deed and a contract permitting the grantors to reacquire title constituted a mortgage. The contract was signed by appellant, ~W. E. Newport, and the appellee, and provides that appellants: “have agreed to sell and have sold to the party of the second part (appellee) and the party of the second part has agreed to purchase and has purchased the following described property, to-wit:
“Front lot 2 and 2 feet off the east side of front lot 3 on the south side of south Main street;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hays v. EmersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Matthews v. StevensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Clark-Mcwilliams Coal Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Rushton v. McIllveneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Sturgis v. HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Smith v. EisenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
- Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Ehrlich v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Monaghan v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
- Trujillo v. MontanoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.