Pitts v. Culpepper
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
Complainant, a resident and taxpayer of Russell county, seeks injunctive relief agaipst the holding of an election for the removal of the county seat from Seale to Phenix City, upon the theory that such an election is not authorized by law.
Equity jurisdiction in cases of this character was established in Dennis v. Prather, 212 Ala. 449, 103 So. 59 (adverted to and differentiated in Wilkinson v. Henry, 221 Ala. 254, 128 So. 362, 70 A. L. R. 712), and that question, we conclude, needs no further discussion.
Complainant insists the election is prohibited by the legislative will, as expressed in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Ferguson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
- City of Mobile v. Mobile Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Board of Revenue v. HueySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Wilkinson v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mobile County v. State Ex Rel. CammackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Moses v. TignerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Cook v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Holcombe v. Mobile CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- C.D. Norris v. SeibelsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977