Taylor v. Richardson
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NEESE, District Judge.
This is the judicial review of a final decision of the defendant administrator, denying the plaintiff Mrs. Taylor’s application for the establishment of a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Both parties have moved for a summary judgment. Rules 59(a), (b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Mrs. Taylor’s disability insured status is conceded to have concluded on March 31, 1966. She bore the burden of proving that her disability arose on or before that date. 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) (3), 423(d) (5); Henry v. Gardner,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carl v. Henry v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Clyde W. King, Jr. v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Bell Cab & U-Drive-It Co. v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
- Cecil Smith v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Snyder v. RibicoffCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sharky’s Sports Bar, et al. v. Village of Mount Morris, Illinois, et al.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026