Legal Opinion

Cecil Smith v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 18, 1966No. 16454PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare appeals from a District Court judgment awarding to appellee, Cecil Smith, benefits under the Social Security laws of the United States. The Secretary’s examiner found, after a hearing, that the said Smith was not at the time of, and following, his application for Social Security benefits, made on July 21, 1961, disabled within the meaning of Section 216(i) (1) (A).

Review of the findings of the trial examiner was had and his decision was affirmed and became the decision of the Secretary. Smith then commenced his action in the United States…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ora P. Hall v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  2. Montward Justice v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  3. Monie King v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  4. James Thompson v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mann v. RichardsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  2. Anna M. Stumbo v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  3. De Jesús Faría v. FinchDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1971
  4. Cancel v. Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1971
  5. Todd v. FinchDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API