Legal Opinion

Williams v. Condit

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 10, 2003No. Record 020476PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

In this appeal, we consider whether the circuit court erred by granting the defendant’s motion to strike the plaintiff’s evidence on the basis that the plaintiff failed to present corroborating testimony as required by Code § 8.01-397, commonly referred to as the dead man’s statute.

Plaintiff, Kathleen Moriarty Williams, filed her motion for judgment in the circuit court against Katharina Condit, personal representative of the estate of Ross R. Condit, Jr. Plaintiff sought damages for personal injuries that she allegedly sustained as a result of an automobile accident that was purportedly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hadeed v. Medic-24, Ltd.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  2. Austin v. Shoney's, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  3. Spangler v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  4. Johnson v. RaviottaSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  5. Epes' Administrator v. HardawaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reed v. SmithRoanoke County Circuit Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API