Legal Opinion

Haines v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1902PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to St. Joseph; Yaple, J. Case by Thomas J. Haines against the Lake Shore Sc Michigan Southern Railway Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action commenced by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover for an injury received by him at a crossing of the highway over the Lake Shore railway track at the city of Three Rivers. He recovered a verdict. The case is brought here by writ of error.

The accident occurred in the early evening. Rock River avenue enters the city of Three Rivers, coming from the northwest, going towards the southeast, until near the crossing of the Lake Shore railway track, which is on Fifth street, when Rock River avenue turns to the east upon Fifth street. This avenue does not run parallel with…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Adams v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Dundas v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Swoboda v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Lewis v. Flint & Pere Marquette Ry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Staal v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mollica v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Beach v. City of St. JosephMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Iamurri v. Saginaw City Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Deneen v. Houghton County Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Amanta v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API