Dowell v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
A good many jurisdictions employ the "prison mailbox rule" to determine whether court filings made by prisoners are timely. Indiana has regularly used this approach as respects filings governed by its appellate rules, recognizing the unique position of pro se prisoners, though we apparently have never expressly adopted the prison mailbox rule. We do so today, still obliging the litigant provide reasonable, legitimate, and verifiable documentation. - Appellant Regunal Dowell's timing problem, however, does not center on a tardy filing under the appellate rules but rather…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Kenneth N. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Dixon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Cooper v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Dowell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
- Erik Morales v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Chris E. Harkins v. Shannon Westmeyer, Jon Niklas, Angie Harkins, and Janet HarkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Malcolm Cobb, Jr. v. Aramark Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Charles M. Martin v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.