Legal Opinion

Charles M. Martin v. Department of Corrections

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 24, 2018No. Docket: Kno-17-51PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJabar, J.

[¶ 1] This case calls for us to consider whether in Maine, pursuant to the "prisoner mailbox rule," a pro se prisoner's civil petition for review of a decision by the Department of Corrections should be deemed "filed" on the date it is delivered to prison officials to be forwarded to the clerk of court rather than the date it is received by the clerk of court. We conclude that in circumstances where, as here, (1) a prisoner is forced to rely on the Department of Corrections to ensure that his Rule 80C petition-challenging the Department's administrative action against him-is filed; (2) that…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Warner v. GlassTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Haag v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aubrey Armstrong v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
  2. FEDEQ DV004 LLC v. CITY OF PORTLANDDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
  3. MARTIN v. SOMERSET COUNTYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
  4. Norman Wayne Davis IV v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API