Legal Opinion

Natalie M. v. Philip M.

New York City Family Court

Decided May 9, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenneth W. O’Hare, J.

This is another in a long series of Family Court proceedings between the parties. The mother initially sought to enforce in this court a Mexican decree of divorce which incorporated by reference a separation agreement entered into between the parties. By order of this court dated January 23, 1974, the father is currently obligated to pay $550 a month plus $35 arrears for the support of the mother and two children, David and Leslie. On March 2, 1977, the father filed for a downward modification, alleging that child support for David should cease because he is over 21.

The terms of a separation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seaman v. SeamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  2. Weber v. WeberNew York City Family Court · 1966
  3. Wach v. WachNew York City Family Court · 1968
  4. Lynch v. LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jarvis v. JarvisNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Reynolds v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Sondra S. v. Matthew G.New York Family Court · 1979
  4. Marino v. LurieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API