Legal Opinion

Chicago Dock Co. v. Foster

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1868PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bbeese

This was an action of replevin, brought to the Superior Court of Chicago, by Thomas H. Foster and Augustine Lee, against Moses and Godfrey Snydacker and the Chicago Dock Company, for one hundred barrels of flour.

The cause was tried by the court without a jury, on several issues made up by the parties, the principal of which was on the defendants’ fourth and fifth pleas—the fourth assuming that the property and right to possession was in F. Smith & Co., and the fifth averred that it was deposited with Moses and Godfrey Snydacker, by Smith & Co., as security for a loan of money to them by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brundage v. CampIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Burton v. CuryeaIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Michigan Central Railroad v. PhillipsIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Adam, Meldrum & Anderson Co. v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Constad v. BuellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
  4. Baehr v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  5. Hanchett v. BuckleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API