Legal Opinion

State v. Dupuis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the circuit court for Marion county. The defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Marion county for the crime of selling and giving intoxicating liquors to a minor.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the circuit court for Marion county. The defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Marion county for the crime of selling and giving intoxicating liquors to a minor. The charging part of the indictment is as follows: “The said Elzear Dupuis, on the twenty-seventh day of August, A. D. 1889, in the county of Marion and State of Oregon, then and there being, did then and there unlawfully sell and give to Charles H. Baker one drink of intoxicating liquor, to wit: lager beer, of the value of five cents, he the said Charles EL Baker then and ihere being a minor, under the age of…

1Opinion of the CourtStbahan, J.

The appellant’s main contention is that the Act of 1887 (Hill’s Code, § 1913) is repealed by the Act of 1889. Session Laws, pp. 9, 10, 11. Section 1913, Hill's Code, being section 1, Acts of 1887, p. 71, provides: “If any person shall sell, or cause to be sold or given, any intoxicating liquors to any minor in this State, or if any keeper of any saloon, bar-room, or other vendor of sprit-uous or intoxicating liquors within this State shall harbor, per*374mit or suffer any minor to loiter or to remain in such saloon, bar-room, or other place where such spirituous or intoxicating liquors aré sold,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. McLoughlin v. MalnarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Jicha v. KarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. HortonOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. State v. HainesOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  5. State v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API