Legal Opinion

Steinman v. Conlon

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to punish an attorney for contempt of court.

1Opinion of the CourtGreenbaum, J.

This is a motion to punish an attorney for contempt of court. It appears that a witness had been duly served with a subpoena duces tecum to attend before a referee appointed by the court to conduct an examination in proceedings supplementary to execution and produce certain assignments by the judgment debtor of her dower rights, which the judgment creditor claims were made to hinder, delay and defraud the creditors of the judgment debtor. The witness was asked whether he had produced the assignments called for by the subpoena duces tecum, to which he replied that he had and that they were in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. King v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Lathrop v. . ClappNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Price v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. Stolts v. TuskaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Dawson v. SickleNew York Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conlon v. MarshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API