Legal Opinion

Stolts v. Tuska

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Carl D. Jackson, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 27th day of January, 1903, adjudging him guilty of contempt of court and fining him therefor.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlet, J.:

The appellant has been adjudged guilty of contempt of court for having willfully disobeyed an injunction order made by this court on the 21st day of November, 1902, in accordance with the opinion delivered on the decision of an appeal by the plaintiff from an order denying a motion for an injunction in this action (76 App. Div. 137). The material facts relating to the relationship and rights of the parties are stated in our former opinion, and need not be restated here. Our decision established that the defendant Tuska was the owner of the dock, bulkheads and adjacent premises on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. King v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Daly v. . AmbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Socialistic Co-Operative Publishing Ass'n v. KuhnNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. People v. ComptonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Lowenthal v. HodgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Lake v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. In re NorthNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Sirkin v. Fourteenth Street StoreCity of New York Municipal Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API