Legal Opinion

Dziedzic Et Ux. v. Kaplan Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1948No. Appeal, 35Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Patterson,

Michael Dziedzic and Mary Dziedzic filed their bill in equity to restrain Isadore Kaplan and Frieda Kaplan, appellees, from proceeding with the erection of a concrete block building to be used as a slaughter house and to compel the removal of that portion already erected, alleging an encroachment upon .an easement existing by virtue of a conveyance of land according to a plan laying out the land into streets, alléys and plots. Edgar J. Hull, one Of the heirs of George M. Hull, the original owner of the land involved, was'permitted to. intervene as-a party…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Transue v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  2. McKee v. PerchmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  3. Andreas v. SteigerwaltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Robinson v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  5. Snyder v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API