Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Knighten

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 29, 1943No. 30994PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

The subject matter of this appeal is an undivided one-fourth interest in lots 11 and 12, block 2, North-side addition to the city of Tulsa.

J. A. Knighten, Sam Tally, and H. R. Stovall, trustees of Coal Creek Lodge No. 88, A. F. & A. M., operating under a charter from Saint John’s Grand Lodge, A. F. & A. M., Prince Hall affiliation, commenced this action against S. Robertson, trustee, and the unknown trustees of Silver Moon Lodge No. 50, and Willie A. Elliott, to quiet title to said one-fourth interest in said lots.

Plaintiffs deraign their title as follows: A warranty deed dated February 26,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wicks v. . MonihanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Moore v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. McMurrough v. AlbertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. State Ex Rel. Wildlife Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Dearing v. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Allied Paint Mfg. Co. v. BanesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Stoltz, Wagner & Brown v. DuncanDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976
  5. City of Wilburton, Oklahoma, Magnolia Petroleum Company, Deno Maggi and Mike Hugo v. Alex SwaffordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API