Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Freer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1872PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Washtenaw Circuit

1Opinion of the Court

■ Christiancy, Ch. J.

The bill in this case was filed by John M. Cummings, and is prosecuted by his executor. Though unartificially drawn, it presents, when its statements are placed in logical order, substantially the following state of facts, as the basis of the relief which it asks: That in the year 1843, one Jonas E. Freer, of the township of Lima, in Washtenaw county, having four sons hereinafter named, and beiug the'owner in fee of the south half of section twenty-one, and the west half of the northwest quarter of the same section, in said township, had before that day (no particular day…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sims v. RigginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. First National Bank v. WentwortSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Parker v. StarrNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Churchill v. ProctorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. Parker v. HardistyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API