Legal Opinion
Parker v. Hardisty
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 21, 1921No. Civ. No. 2367PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The opinion of the trial judge, which is set out in respondents’ brief, seems to us to be a clear and satisfactory exposition of the facts and of the legal principles involved in the case, and we hereby adopt it, as follows:
“This is an action to vacate a judgment of this Court heretofore rendered by Judge MeSorley and entered on January 24, 1910. The facts upon which plaintiffs seek relief are in substance as follows:
“On March 29, 1895, one Robert Reed Jenkins was the owner of 1350 acres of agricultural land in Calaveras County, one lot in Camp Seco, and four lots in the city of Stockton.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- City of El Reno v. Cleveland-Trinidad Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Blair v. HazzardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Enos v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Hart v. WaltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Getty v. GettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Radin v. Jewish National FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Huntoon v. Southern Trust & Commerce BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Watson v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Orcutt v. FerraniniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965