Legal Opinion

In re Snap

New York City Family Court

Decided August 31, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*315OPINION OF THE COURT

Jeffry H. Gallet, J.

These two juvenile delinquency proceedings, in which the respondent is being detained and is charged with less than a C felony, raise questions of whether or when a respondent is entitled to a “probable-cause” hearing and under what conditions either a full fact-finding hearing or a probable cause hearing may be adjourned.

The controversy revolves around two seemingly inconsistent sections of the new article 3 of the Family Court Act, sections 325.1 and 340.1. There appears to be no case law to aid in interpreting those sections, but the cases construing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Guggenheim v. MucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. People ex rel. Kaufmann v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. In re Renaldo Q.New York Family Court · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Christopher B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re David C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API