Legal Opinion

Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. Ragland

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 2, 1987No. 85-115PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

At issue is whether or not this court will exercise jurisdiction over the appellant’s 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 claims.

This case has a long history. Seven years ago, in 1980, the appellee, state, assessed appellant, Writers’ Project, on the sales of its Arkansas Times Magazine. Appellant initially contested the assessment but reached a settlement with the state and began to pay the tax. However, appellant reserved the right to renew its challenge if there were a change in the tax law or a court ruling bringing the tax into question. The Supreme Court’s ruling in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. League of Women Voters of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. RaglandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Robinson v. BeaumontSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Newton v. EtochSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Virden v. RoperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Opinion No. (2003), Nebraska Attorney General Reports2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API