Legal Opinion

Dobbins v. Graer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1911No. 6317PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Denver County Court — Hon. Charles McCall, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garrigues

1. Each of said propositions of counsel must be resolved against them. The evidence of the necessity, amount and value of the labor is overwhelming, and the law is that Graer should be holden for it, and it should be deducted from any moneys due him for unloading the coal. — McGonigle v. Klein, 6 Col. App. 306.

2. The court erred in not sustaining the motion for a new trial. Where the verdict is manifestly against the weight of the evidence, it should be set aside. — D. & R. G. R. R. Co. v. Peterson, 30 Colo. 77; Beulah M. Co. v. Mattice, 22 Colo. 558; Manufacturing Co. v. Collins, 13 Col.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  2. Beulah Marble Co. v. MatticeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  3. Hoover v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cooley v. Big Horn Harvestore Systems, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Grant Investments Co. v. Fuller & CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  3. Sterling Lumber & Investment Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API