Legal Opinion
Cooley v. Big Horn Harvestore Systems, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 17, 1989No. 84CA1415PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN CISE, Judge.
Defendants, Big Horn Harvestore Systems, Inc. (Big Horn) and A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. (AOSHPI), appeal the judgment against them for $245,-077.26 on claims of negligence and failure of essential purpose of a limited remedy-constituting breach of contract. Plaintiffs cross-appeal the reduction in the jury award from a total of $324,028.66 to $245,-077.26. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions.
This case arises out of the purchase and use of a grain silo by plaintiffs Robert and Rita Cooley and its use by all plaintiffs. The silo included as…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Jones v. DresselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- City of Aurora v. LovelessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cooley v. Big Horn Harvestore Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Scognamillo v. OlsenColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Zemco Manufacturing, Incorporated v. Navistar International Transportation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Costco Wholesale Corp. v. World Wide Licensing Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Gold Rush Investments, Inc. v. G.E. Johnson Construction Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.