Legal Opinion
Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 5, 1948No. 13707PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is taken to reverse a judgment for $6,495.87 in favor of plaintiff in an action for damages arising out of the sale of certain canned spinach by defendant to plaintiff. The contract for the sale originated in k telegram from defendant (doing business as Smith Canning Co.) to plaintiff A. & P. Tea Company, “Do you want 3300 cases standard twos spinach 1.10 Government Certificate”, to which the Tea Company responded, “Will accept certificated spinach offered if last of February shipment okay advise if available our labels.” A formal contract followed, by the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Carleton v. . Lombard, Ayres Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Griggs Canning Co. v. JoseyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Bierman v. . City Mills Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sherman v. JacobsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Tornello v. Deligiannis Brothers, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- United States Ex Rel. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. H. R. Henderson & Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
- Bartlett & Company, Grain v. The Merchants Company, the Merchants Company v. Bartlett& Company, GrainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Simon v. Graham BakerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.