Legal Opinion
Teeples v. Tolson
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 22, 1962No. Civ. 60-316PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs demand judgment against the defendant insurance company for the sum of $77,455.00 with interest and attorney fees. Plaintiffs are engaged in the general construction business in the state of Oregon. Defendant and associated underwriters are engaged in the insurance business and are authorized to carry on an insurance underwriting business in the state of Oregon.
On December 7, 1959, plaintiffs signed a contract to erect a department store building in the city of Portland and thereafter commenced the construction of such building. In January 1960 defendant,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- I-L Logging Co. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- George B. Wallace Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Parker v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. WinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Shea v. Bay State Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Sentinel Management Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Shea v. BAY STATE GAS CO. CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- McNeilab, Inc. v. North River InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.