In re Lester
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In this submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to CPLR 3222, it is directed that judgment be entered in the Supreme Court, New York County, declaring that the first sentence of paragraph 2 of the agreement between Emile Z. Berman and Berman & Frost, dated November 29, 1972, entitles Emile Z. Berman to a pro rata share of the three groups of partnership assets described in paragraph numbered 4 of the submission herein, without costs or disbursements. The parties submit a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts by which they seek to resolve a dispute as to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re LesterNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Jackson v. Hunt, Hill & BettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bader v. Cox, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
- Lewis v. Vladeck, Elias, Vladeck, Zimny & Engelhard, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Development Specialists, Inc. ex rel. Coudert Brothers LLP v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Development Specialists, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Bader v. Cox, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.