Jackson v. Hunt, Hill & Betts
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.
On December 31,1954 there were 13 partners in the New York City law firm of Hunt, Hill and Betts. Two estates of deceased partners were likewise interested in the firm. Thirteen seems to have been an unsatisfactory number, for three of the partners — A. V. Cherbonnier, Mahlon Dickerson and Robert McLeod Jackson (plaintiff herein) —withdrew from the firm as of that date. Agreements were made with Cherbonnier .and Dickerson under which they were to receive certain earned but uncollected fees when paid. No similar *183agreement was made with Jackson who now sues to establish his right to participate…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Aurnou v. GreenspanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Lewis v. Vladeck, Elias, Vladeck, Zimny & Engelhard, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Liddle, Robinson & Shoemaker v. ShoemakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Development Specialists, Inc. ex rel. Coudert Brothers LLP v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- In re LesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.