Legal Opinion
Davis v. Overall
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 13, 2009No. A09A1088PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.
Lamar Davis and Howard Farmer sued Richard Overall for damages in a dispute over a family cemetery located on Overall’s land. Davis and Farmer contended that Overall had interfered with the family’s easement across Overall’s land to and from the cemetery and had trespassed and created a continuing nuisance within the cemetery. The trial court granted Davis and Farmer’s request for a permanent easement within the cemetery’s boundaries and a right of ingress and egress to and from the cemetery. The court granted Overall’s motion for summary judgment on Davis and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Williams v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Tyler v. LincolnSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Swift v. BroylesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Baumann v. SniderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Weller v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Higginbotham v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Paradise Lost, LLC v. Oglethorpe Power CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Kelly v. FannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- CITY OF EAST POINT v. YOUNG; And Vice VersaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.