Legal Opinion

Baumann v. Snider

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 24, 2000No. A99A2124PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Christopher and Karen Baumann sued their neighbors, Michael Snider and Julie Abston, for trespass and nuisance, claiming that improvements Snider and Abston had made to their property caused increased rainwater runoff onto the Baumanns’ property. After a jury found in favor of the Baumanns, Snider and Abston filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which the trial court granted. The Baumanns appeal, and for reasons that follow, we reverse and remand with direction.

The evidence, viewed most favorably to support the jury verdict, shows the following. The Baumanns’…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. City of Columbus, Ga. v. MyszkaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Ponce De Leon Condominiums v. DiGirolamoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Department of Human Resources v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  4. Bryant v. ColvinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Read v. BenedictCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Weller v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. Sumitomo Corp. of America v. DealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Fields Bros. General Contractors, Inc. v. RueckstiesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Robert L. Lafontaine v. Thomas P. WatleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  5. Meacham v. Franklin-Heard County Water AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API