People v. Lafka
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction after jury verdict, of two felonies, violations of section 487, Penal Code (1) theft of a diamond ring valued in excess of $200, and (2) theft of money in excess of $200.
Questions Presented
1. Sufficiency of evidence.
2. Corroboration of prosecuting witness.
1. Evidence
Defendant contends that the money was an outright loan by the complaining witness to him and the ring was given for the purpose of sale, the proceeds to be a similar loan to him, all for the purpose of enabling him to finance the purchase of a bar business. The prosecution contends…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. BartgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People v. RaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. CurtinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. FultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. MaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.