Legal Opinion

Bowen v. . Fox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal— Certiorari — Negligence. This was a MOTION to reinstate AN appeal and for the writ of certiorari made at this.term. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The case is stated in the opinion. The plaintiff obtained judgment against the defendant in the Superior Court of the county of Vance at May Term, 1887, from which the defendant appealed to this Court. By consent of counsel, the defendant had until the first day of July following to give the necessary undertaking on appeal, but such undertaking was not given until 22 August next thereafter.

At the Fall Term of 1887 of this Court, the appeal having been docketed here, the plaintiff moved to dismiss the same upon the ground that the undertaking on appeal had not been given within the time…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Winborn v. . ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. Griffin v. . NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. State v. . WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  5. Wiley v. . LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Griffin v. . NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Graves v. . HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API