Murray v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
937 So.2d 277 (2006)
Robert Wayne MURRAY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D05-3691.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
September 13, 2006.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
FARMER, J.
In criminal trials the law requires a high level of confidence in the guilt of the accused.[1] That requirement is vital to the outcome.[2] By long tradition, the State is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- State v. KettellSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Fields v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Sipple v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Novak v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.