Legal Opinion

Chicago, Wilmington & Vermilion Coal Co. v. Moran

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1904PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of LaSalle county; the Hon. H. M. Trimble, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

On January 26, 1901, the appellee, Thomas Moran, a boy sixteen years of age, was working with his father, Patrick Moran, in a coal mine of the appellant, the Chicago, Wilmington and Vermilion Coal Company, at Seatonville, Illinois. Appellant paid Patrick Moran by the ton for the coal mined by himself and his minor son, the appellee. They worked in room 77, and their method was to undercut or take out six inches of clay under the vein of coal, which was about three feet and six inches thick. The full width of the room was forty-two feet, and after removal of the coal it was about four feet…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Scott v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Connole v. East St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Gordon's Transports, Inc. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  4. Martin v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BeattySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API