Legal Opinion

Kampmann v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 6, 2019No. CR-18-764PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKenneth S. Hixson, Judge

Appellant Dustin Kampmann pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, and on December 15, 2016, the trial court entered a sentencing order placing Kampmann on six years' probation. Kampmann's written conditions of probation prohibited him from committing a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment and from using any controlled substance.

On December 1, 2017, the State filed a motion to revoke Kampmann's probation, alleging that he had violated his conditions by possessing drug paraphernalia on October 18, 2017, and by admitting to using *546marijuana and Xanax…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Conley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Mosley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Richard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Atteberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Evelyn Faye Seamster v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API