Legal Opinion
Holbrook v. New York State Employees' Retirement System
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 12, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sweeney, J.
This is a CPLR article 78 proceeding brought by petitioner to vacate a determination of respondent New York State Employees’ Retirement System, which concluded that petitioner was subject-to mandatory retirement at age 70. The facts are not in dispute and the issue presented appears to be one of first impression.
*64Petitioner reached age 70 on June 10, 1980. He is a disabled veteran of the United States Army. He has held civil service positions with the State of New York since December, 1971, and is presently employed as an unemployment insurance referee with the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- People v. NewmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Nutt v. New York State Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- New York v. NewmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hart v. KaplanNew York Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Claim of Thomas v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Kutas v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1987
- Mirando v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983