Legal Opinion

Irondequoit Bay Pure Waters District v. Nalews, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur B. Curran, J.

This is a motion by the third-party defendants, hereinafter referred to as Teetor-Dobbins, to dismiss the four “claims of relief” alleged against them by the third-party plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as Nalews.

In 1973, the Irondequoit Bay Pure Waters District and Nalews contracted with regard to the construction of a project entitled the Cross Irondequoit Pump Station. Nalews, as a general contractor, was to perform the construction work for the project in accordance with the requirements of the project’s plans and specifications. The plans *463and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Alvord & Swift v. Stewart M. Muller Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. 219 Broadway Corp. v. Alexander's, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Compania Transatlantica EspanolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Underpinning & Foundation Constructors, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Schauer v. JoyceNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API