Legal Opinion

Dorothy Hennesey, Doing Business as Hennesey & Co. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Great American Life Underwriters, Inc., Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 10, 1961No. 13384_1PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Chief Judge.

On September 13, 1960, Dorothy Hennesey, doing business as Hennesey & Co., filed a petition in this court, purportedly pursuant to section 43(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 844, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 80a-42(a), 1 for review of an order of the Securities and Exchange Commission, issued on July 15, 1960, exempting The Great American Life Underwriters, Inc. (Underwriters) from the provisions of the Act from and after January 1, 1941, the effective date of the Act. On October 18, 1960, by order of this court, Underwriters was granted leave to intervene…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Red River Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. West Tennessee Power & Light Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Colorado Radio Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board v. Butler Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  3. New England Whitewater Center, Inc. v. Department of Inland Fisheries & WildlifeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  4. Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. Toy Manufacturers of America, Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API