Legal Opinion
Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 1, 2014No. 13-60140, 13-60141PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge:
In these petitions for review the Louisiana Public Service Commission (the “Louisiana Commission”) challenges the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“FERC”) interpretation of contractual language. Holding, among other things, that FERC’s interpretation is not arbitrary, unreasonable, or contrary to law, we DENY in part and DISMISS in part the Louisiana Commission’s petitions for review.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
A. The Entergy System and the System Agreement
Entergy Corporation (“Entergy Corporation”) 1 sells electricity in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Minnesota Voters Alliance v. ManskySupreme Court of the United States · 2018
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State of TX v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- R. Acosta, Secretary, LABR v. Hensel Phelps ConstrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Markle Interests, L.L.C. v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.