Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kassis v. Teacher's Insurance & Annuity Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 1998Published

1Dissent

Tom, J. (dissenting).

The issue on this appeal is whether the law firm of Thurm & Heller should be disqualified as counsel to defendants because the firm hired an associate attorney who was actively representing the opposing party on the same matter in litigation.

Plaintiff Kassis commenced the underlying action in 1992 to recover for property damage incurred by his buildings during construction work performed by defendant Cauldwell-Wingate Company on an adjoining building owned by defendant Teacher’s Insurance and Annuity Association. When the complaint was amended in 1994, Weg & Myers, P. C.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cardinale v. GolinelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Solow v. W. R. Grace & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. Standard Oil CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  4. GAF Corp. v. ChengSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Saftler v. Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API