Seal v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
David Glenn Seal v. State of Maryland, No. 51, September Term, 2015, Opinion by Adkins, J. CRIMINAL LAW — MARYLAND WIRETAPPING AND ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE ACT — ACTING UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF AN INVESTIGATIVE OR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER — SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE: An individual does not act “under the supervision of an investigative or law enforcement officer” where the police merely set up recording equipment, instruct the victim on how to conduct the recording and give the individual the equipment to conduct the recording on his or her own in another state. Circuit Court for Montgomery…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- United States v. Harold Haimowitz, Dan Scarborough, George L. OnettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Michael D. Andreas and Terrance S. Wilson, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- State v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.