Legal Opinion
Arenivas v. Continental Oil Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 11, 1984No. 6088PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
The motion for rehearing is granted concerning the issue regarding the use of the deposition at trial. In all other respects, it is denied.
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Plaintiff sought to recover damages for injuries received in an accident while working on defendant’s oil pumping unit. Plaintiff proceeded on theories of product liability and negligence — failure to provide a safe place to work. At the close of plaintiff’s case, the trial court directed a verdict for defendant and plaintiff appeals.
We affirm.
Defendant operates the MCA field where the accident occurred. This…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Armstrong Rubber Co. v. UrquidezTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Mozert v. NoedingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Proctor v. WaxlerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Fresquez v. Southwestern Industrial Contractors & Riggers, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Klopp v. Wackenhut Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Banks v. IMC Kalium Carlsbad Potash Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Bellman v. NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- Reichert v. AtlerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Reichert v. AtlerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.