Legal Opinion

Castle v. Powell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 24, 1931No. Gen. No. 34,366PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kerher

In an action in assumpsit, commenced by the City State Bank of Chicago based upon a written agreement of guaranty signed by-defendants, there was a trial without a jury on a stipulation of facts resulting in a finding and judgment against defendants for $1,697.30. Morrison H. Castle became the assignee of the bank’s claim and was substituted as plaintiff. He prosecutes this appeal and claims that the judgment should have been for $30,000. Under the pleadings and the stipulated facts the question whether he is entitled to a judgment for the larger sum is wholly one of law.

The agreement of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Continental Can Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Scovill Manufacturing Co. v. CassidyIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Taussig v. ReidIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Mamerow v. National Lead Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Whalen v. StephensIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ringgold Capital IV, LLC v. FinleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  2. Stannish v. Community Bank of Homewood-FlossmoorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  3. Kingsberry Homes, a Division of Boise Cascade Corporation v. Maurice E. Corey and Luke M. HebbleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  4. OLIN CORPORATION v. AspinwallDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
  5. Notz v. Tate (In re Chicago Discount Commodity Brokers, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API