Legal Opinion

Russi v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1945No. Civ. 12857PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The appellant moves for an order of augmentation of the record “whereby the clerk’s transcript of the testimony taken at the trial of said cause may be augmented by including in said transcript of testimony all oral testimony received and admitted at the trial of said cause.” The “ground” of the motion is stated to be “in order to correctly and properly present the record of the proceedings in the lower court.” In support of the motion the appellant refers to Rules on Appeal numbers 12(a), 12(b) and 12(c). The respondent resists the motion upon the ground that appellant has voluntarily…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Averill v. LincolnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Lankster v. Alpha Beta Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Brown v. GuyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Bank of America, N.T. & S.A. v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. People v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API