Tmi, Inc. v. Joseph M. Maxwell
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PRADO, Circuit Judge:
Following a bench trial, the district court determined that Appellant Joseph . Maxwell’s website that complained about Appellee TMI, Inc. violated the anti-dilution provision of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c); the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (“ACPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d); and the Texas Anti-Dilution Statute, Tex. Bus. & Com.Code § 16.29. Concluding that Maxwell’s site, as a non-commercial gripe site, violates none of these statutes, we reverse and render judgment in favor of Maxwell.
Appellant Joseph Maxwell intended to buy a house from Appellee TMI,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Panavision International, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership v. Dennis Toeppen Network Solutions, Inc., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Darrell J. Bird v. Marshall Parsons, Stephen Vincent, George Decarlo, Dotster, Inc., and afternic.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Avery Dennison Corp. v. SumptonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- The Taubman Company v. Webfeats, a Texas Company and Henry Mishkoff, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bosley Medical Institute, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Bosley Medical Group, S.C., an Illinois Corporation v. Michael Steven KremerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Utah Lighthouse Ministry v. Foundation for Apologetic Information & ResearchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Lamparello v. FalwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Coca-Cola Co. v. PurdyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Pensacola Motor Sales Inc. v. Eastern Shore Toyota, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.