Legal Opinion
Hubshman v. Radco, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 29, 1947No. Civ. 38-8PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
This is a motion by the third party defendants to dismiss a third party complaint, or in the alternative, for a bill of particulars to supplement the third party complaint.
*602The plaintiffs in their complaint allege in substance that E. W. Kenngott Company, Inc., a corporation, sold and delivered to the defendant Radco, Inc., certain merchandise which it is alleged Radco, Inc. accepted in the amount of $42,000. It is further alleged that E. W. Kenngott Company, Inc. assigned the monies due on the alleged sale to individuals Kenngott and Norris, a partnership under the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crim v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1939
- Sussan v. StrasserDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
- People of State of Illinois v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- United States v. JollimoreDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. McAuleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Fidelity and Casualty Company, Inc. v. The Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Automotive Finance Co. v. DaigleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Joe Grasso & Son, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1966
- Brown v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1959