Legal Opinion

Fellows, Gamage Co. v. Jackman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

This action was originally brought in 1931 against one Moore and one Jane Doe Jackman, doing business under the name and style of The Oaks. The latter was never served, and the former ceased to be a defendant by discontinuance in 1933, after the present defendant Howard Jackman had been brought into the case by amendment.

The case was presented to the Superior Court upon the *572report of an auditor whose findings of fact were to be final. It was not denied that the goods set forth in the declaration were delivered at a restaurant called The Oaks. The plaintiff contended that The Oaks was operated…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jennings v. BragdonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Tart v. FiskeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  3. Clarke v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Kamberg v. Springfield National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Beacon Motor Car Co. v. ShadmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stoney v. SoarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Harrington v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  3. Hibernia Savings Bank v. BombaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  4. Vision Systems, Inc. v. EMC Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2005
  5. Finley v. MattsonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API