Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sovereen v. Meadows

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1979No. 15782Published

1DissentJiall, Justice

I am constrained to dissent since the main opinion addresses the merits of the case rather than confining its review to the sole issue presented, viz., whether the trial court abused its discretion by granting a motion to set aside a default judgment conditioned upon the payment of an attorney’s fee.

The setting aside of defaults and judgments is an equitable procedure provided by U.R.C.P. Rule 55(c) thereof contains the following:

For good cause shown the court may set aside an entry of default and, if a judgment by default has been entered, may likewise set it aside in accordance with Rule…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Warren v. Dixon Ranch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Airkem Intermountain, Inc. v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Ney v. HarrisonUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Mayhew v. Standard Gilsonite CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Peterson v. CrosierUtah Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API