Legal Opinion

Hoyne v. Wurstner

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1945No. 1841PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, P. J.

This appeal is noted as upon questions of law and fact but all proceedings since that time have treated the appeal as one upon questions of law. There is a bill of exceptions duly settled and allowed, assignments of error are filed and it is so briefed. We, therefore, consider and decide the appeal as upon questions of law.

Five errors are specified but they all may be encompassed in one, namely, that the evidence submitted on the issues does not support and is manifestly against the finding and judgment. The amended petition in substance asserts that the plaintiff at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Chicago v. SchmidingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hillerege v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. McClain v. City of South PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. De Pace v. Mayor and Council of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1950
  4. De Pace v. Mayor of WilmingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API