Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rucker v. Aymett

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1949Published

1Concurrence

Me. Chiee Justice Neil

(concurring).

This appeal from the decree of the chancellor is similar in all respects to that of Mrs. Claribel Rice, 188 Tenn. 284, 219 S. W. (2d) 177, except that Jefferson was brought into court by garnishment where he filed a sworn *298answer in which he stated nneqnivocally that he was not indebted to Julian Aymett, the judgment debtor, and that he had no property in his possession belonging to the said Aymett of any kind or character. The answer was filed on October 5, 1946. On February 11, 1947, a subpoena duces tecum was issued and served upon him directing him to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. J. C. Mahan Motor Co. v. LyleTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. DerrisseauxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  3. Rucker v. AymettTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. VanVleet v. StrattonTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Mayor of Nashville v. Potomac InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API